Cumberland ankle instability tool questionnaire pdf

Cumberland ankle instability tool questionnaire pdf
Leg pain (shin splints) Ankle instability (easy twisting injuries) Achilles tendon pain Difficulty/Pain with brisk walking or running Discoloration of toes/foot Pain legs occurs at same distance every time
The SMFA questionnaire is a val-idated tool, and its reliability, validity, and responsiveness were established in a large sample of individuals who had a musculoskeletal disease or injury result- ing in excellent internal consistency and stability.6 The SMFA questionnaire may be used for clinical assessments of the impact of treatment in groups of patients who have musculoskeletal disease or
Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) [9], a discrimi- native questionnaire that can identify patients with CAI and measure the severity of functional ankle instability.
Ankle instability was determined using the Cumberland ankle instability tool (CAIT) questionnaire, which is used to evaluate CAI. 22 CAIT questionnaire consists of 9 questions rated on a scale of 0-3 points, 0-4 points, and 0-5 points, with the total score ranging from 0 to 30 points.
pant completed a self-report questionnaire (Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool; CAIT, a 9-item 30-point scale), which was developed to measure the severity (cut-off score < 24) of functional ankle instability (Hiller et al., 2006). The definition of CAI endorsed by the Internation-al Ankle Consortium for enrolling participants was adapted in the present study, which included a history of at
Ankle joint sprain and the subsequent development of chronic ankle instability (CAI) are commonly encountered by clinicians involved in the treatment and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal injuries. It has recently been advocated that ankle joint post-sprain rehabilitation protocols should
Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool. The tool is a questionnaire with 9 adjectival scale questions (Streiner and Norman 2003) that generates a score between 0 and 30 and has high reliability and discriminative validity (Hiller et al 2006). Scores ≥ 28 indicate stability while scores ≤ 23 indicate functional ankle instability. Proprioception at the ankle was measured as movement detection at

Recalibration and Validation of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool Cutoff Score for Individuals With Chronic Ankle Instability Presented as a poster to the National Athletic Trainers Association, June 2011, New Orleans, LA; and the American College of Sports Medicine, June 2011, Denver, CO.
The ankle questionnaires included the Functional Ankle Disability Index, Ankle Instability Instrument, Ankle Joint Functional Assessment Tool, and Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool. Demographic, postural stability and questionnaire variables were compared using independent samples t-tests. A series of Pearson correlation coefficients were computed to determine the relationship between ankle
9-item questionnaire, the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT), enables classification according to a score between 0 and 30, where scores greater than or equal to 28 represent no instability and scores less than or equal to 27 represent FAI.17 Also, scores less than or equal to 27 have an increasing representation of in-stability as the scores become lower, with a clear marker from
Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT). First published by Hiller in 2006 7 the CAIT is a 9-item, 30-point questionnaire that is utilized without comparison to the contralateral ankle.

Therapeutic interventions for improving self-reported

Original research The chronic ankle instability scale

Hiller et al. designed the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT). It was originally developed in English and proved to be of high content validity and good reliability. The main advantage of the questionnaire is that it consists of only 9 items, minimizing patient burden and increasing reliability. The precision of the instrument is increased as it is a multiple answer option instrument. In
1/05/2013 · The Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) is a questionnaire that measures the severity of functional ankle instability. While it has been shown to be a valid and reliable tool, it is less sensitive in measuring differences in severe instability.
Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT). Singe-leg jump landings in the anterior and lateral directions were utilized to assess DPS. Subjects were positioned 40% and 33% of their height from the edge of a force plate and a 30cm and 15cm hurdle placed at the midpoint, respectively. Subjects were instructed to land in the middle of the force plate, stabilize as quickly as possible, and remain
AbstractPurpose To study validity and reliability of a Japanese version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool and to determine the optimal cutoff score. Methods In this study, the questionnaire was cross-culturally adapted into Japanese. The psychometric properties tested in the Japanese version of the CAIT were measured for criteria
What is shorthand of Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool? The most common shorthand of “Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool” is cait. You can also look at abbreviations and acronyms with word cait in term.
O: self-reported function OR patient generated outcome OR perceived function OR Functional Ankle Disability Index OR Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool OR Foot and Ankle Ability Measure OR Chronic ankle instability scale OR Ankle Joint Functional Assessment Tool.
The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) is a region-specific, non–disease-specific outcome instrument that possesses many of the clinimetric qualities recommended for an outcome instrument. Evidence of validity to support the use of the FAAM is available in individuals with a wide array of ankle

Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT),23 Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM),24,25 Foot Ankle Instability Questionnaire (FAIQ),26 Foot and Ankle Outcome Source (FAOS),21,27 and Identification of Functional Ankle Instability (IdFAI).28 There are several factors to consider when selecting a questionnaire. The questionnaire should be clear and concise, be able to be …
berland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT)” in Iranian athletes with lateral ankle sprain. Materials & Methods The present study is a methodological and non-experimental study. After forward
BACKGROUND In physiotherapy, the most established instrument that can be used to detect ankle injuries is the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT), a questionnaire …
(AII), Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT), or the IdFAI to deter-mine the presence of CAI. Since the IdFAI was created by combining both the AII and CAIT, we felt it was the most appropriate tool for our pur-poses. 35 Additionally, the IdFAI has undergone a series of tests that found it to be short, easy to administer and grade, capable of being applied to each limb independently, and
fied by the Freiburg Questionnaire of physical activity. Subjects were asked to fill out the 12 standardized ques-tions, related to basic, leisure, and sports-type activities. In conformity with the International Ankle Consor-tium chronical ankle instability was measured by the by the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT). This self-re-ported questionnaire consists of 9 items with a …
Inclusion criteria were at least 1 previous ankle sprain, at least 2 episodes of “giving way” in the 3 months before the study, and a Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool score ≤24.
The CAIT is a questionnaire that determines the stability and history of previous ankle sprain of each athlete. Previous research shows that a cut-off score of 25 or lower indicates chronic ankle instability. A separate correlation and regression were used to analyze the relationship between composite YBT scores and the CAIT scores.
in chronic ankle instability: Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) 2006 [51] Tegner 1985 [42] Foot and ankle instability questionnaire (FAIQ) 2007 [52] Halasi 2004 [43] Chronic ankle instability scale (CAIS) 2008 [53] Identification of foot and ankle instability (IdFAI) 2011 [54] To-date, there has been no consensus on the best score to use. A variety of instruments have been
Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool score (range 0–30) 26.3 4.3 26.6 5.1 26.4 4.6 Sex 3 women, 7 men 3 women, 7 men 6 women, 14 men the stance phase of running, which may predispose an indi-
Objectives: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the reliability of persian version of the “Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT)” in Iranian athletes with lateral ankle sprain. Matterials & Methods: The present study is a methodological and non-experimental study. After forward and backward translation of CAIT, 46

Additionally the questionnaires contains the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) to evaluate recovery. To ensure all patients with CAI are identified, one year after their ER visit they will be contacted, inquiring on persisting complaints and ankle instability. Patients that indicate on the first questionnaire they sustained ankle sprains prior
Background: The Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) is a valid and reliable patient reported outcome used to assess the presence and severity of chronic ankle instability (CAI). The CAIT has
recently the cumberland ankle instability tool (CAIT; Hiller, Refshauge, Bundy, Herbert, & Killbreath, 2006). The International Classification of Functioning, Dis- ability and Health (ICF; WHO, 2001) recommends that health problems are described, documented and eval-uated in terms of impairments, disabilities and partici-pation problems, personal and environmental factors. The above-mentioned
This evaluation tool is composed of 9-item questionnaire according to degree of instability ankle. CAIT enables classification according to a score between 0 and 30, where scores greater than or …
FUNCTIONAL ANKLE INSTABILITY” has been approved by his or her committee as satisfactory completion of the thesis or dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Rehabilitation and Movement Science.
To examine the effect of 4-week balance training intervention on self-reported ankle instability using Cumberland ankle instability tool questionnaire (CAIT) and ankle joint position sense (JPS) using joint position-reposition test in patients with FAI.
the CAIT questionnaire and were scored on the visual analog scale (VAS), and ankle inversion/eversion peak torque was measured. The VAS is a simple and frequently used tool for assessment of variations in intensity of pain, with participants
Schedule interview was conducted using questionnaire consisting of 55 questions, focusing on demography, training profile, present and past ankle injury, impact of ankle injury and medical service utilization. Functional ankle instability was measured using Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool CAIT (Hiller et al., 2006) [18]. It is a 9-item self reported questionnaire that gives a score between 0

Cumberland Foot & Ankle Center

The Foot & Ankle Disability Index (FADI) Score

Original Article Effects of visual feedback balance

correlated with DPS suggesting the questionnaires may be

The effect of balance training on ankle proprioception in

Prevalence of Chronic Ankle Instability and Associated

The Relationship Between Y-Balance Test Scores and

A 4-Week Neuromuscular Training Program and Gait Patterns

3-D Analysis of a Functional Reach Test in Subjects With

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Spanish

CURRENT PROJECTS Research Teams – FA – The University of

Validity of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure in Athletes